疑犯追踪
Leading early, Machado claims win in Venezuelan opposition’s presidential primary_我的网站
一 | 本文来自微信公众号：那些原本是废话的常识，作者：叶克飞，头图来自：AI生成 前几天，有网友发帖举报，称南昌大学双选会现场出现露骨女主播招聘海报，认为211大学不应被这样的企业混入。
二 | 其后南昌大学道歉，表示“该企业已在江西省大学生就业服务平台注册登记，此次申请入校招聘的岗位有人事专员、主播、剪辑师助理等，符合校园招聘要求，但该企业摆放的海报未向学校报备。” 我反而不能理解南昌大学的道歉，从涉事海报来看，招聘文字部分很正常，照片确实俗气，但并没有脱离整个社会大环境，很多人天天看的抖音快手小红书，这样的打扮不是比比皆是吗？ 很多人意难平的点，实际上是这样的招聘海报出现在211高校的双选会上。若是出现在大专招聘会上，他们就未必觉得那么刺眼。
三 | CARACAS, Venezuela -- Early returns in the Venezuelan opposition's presidential primary gave a big lead to former legislator Maria Corina Machado early Monday, and she quickly claimed victory as the voters' choice to lead the campaign to end the decade-long, crisis-ridden presidency of Nicolás Maduro. The independent National Primary Commission, which organized the primary, did not release any results until long after polling stations closed Sunday, blaming internet censorship. The organizers said that in the first 601,110 ballots counted, about 93% picked Machado, who had entered the vote as a strong front-runner. The rest of the votes were scattered among the other nine candidates. There was no indication of how many people cast ballots in all, and organizers were expected to release additional results throughout Monday.“Today, very powerful forces have been unleashed," Machado told supporters gathered outside her campaign headquarters in the capital, Caracas. “Today, we have shown ourselves what we are capable of doing in the face of all the obstacles, in the face of all the abuses.”Holding Venezuela’s first presidential primary since 2012 required the deeply fractured opposition to work together. Venezuelans, in turn, showed up at voting centers in and outside of their homeland to make it count, enthusiastically lining up for hours despite scorching sun and torrential rain.Still, what they saw as a monumental exercise in democracy could still prove futile, if Maduro’s government wishes.While the administration agreed in principle to let the opposition choose its candidate for the 2024 presidential election, it also has already barred Machado from running for office. Maduro’s government has in the past bent the law, retaliated against opponents and breached agreements as it sees fit.Hundreds of people gathered at voting centers in neighborhoods across Caracas even before polls opened. They stayed in line despite a rainstorm that left them soaking wet. They carried umbrellas, folding stools and coffee to ease the expected waits, and leaned against buildings or stood under marquees to try to avoid the rain. Caracas resident Stephanie Aguilar, 34, cried while she waited to vote. She described the primary as the only “salvation” for her country, her daughter and son, and the millions of Venezuelans who decided they had to emigrate due to the nation’s economic and political turmoil. “We want a better country, a free country, for my children ... who have grown up in this government,” Aguilar, a housewife, said as she wiped tears from her face. “They ask, ‘Mom, can we go out to eat?’ No, there is no money. ‘Mom, can we do this thing?’ No, there is no money. It is unfortunate that a society grows up under those conditions.”Venezuelans typically vote at public schools, but the independent commission that oversaw the primary opted to use homes, churches, private schools and other facilities after electoral authorities did not respond to requests for help in a timely manner.Jesús María Casal, head of the National Primary Commission, blamed the hours-long delay in issuing election results on internet restrictions. “Once we began the process of counting the results ... we detected that our server that functioned as a transmission channel was blocked, which prevents us from completing this process as scheduled,” he said.The London-based internet monitoring firm NetBlocks tweeted metrics showing “a disruption to internet connectivity in #Venezuela with high impact to Caracas." It added that a state-owned internet service provider claimed “an issue with its energy backup system.”David Smilde, an expert on Venezuelan politics at Tulane University, said the primary was a “significant achievement” for several reasons, including forcing political leaders and parties within the opposition “to reach out and speak to the people.”“And it has generated considerable enthusiasm and mobilization in a population that has been skeptical of the opposition leadership of late,” he said.Machado, a proponent of free-market economic policies, is a longtime critic of the governing United Socialist Party of Venezuela. She maintained a somewhat low profile for years but dominated the primary campaign by connecting with the same voters she consistently urged to boycott previous elections.The presidential election is expected to be scheduled for the second half of 2024. Maduro is looking to extend his presidency until 2030, which would surpass the time that Hugo Chávez, his mentor, governed and established his self-described socialist policies.Maduro’s allies ridiculed and dismissed the primary all year. Still, both the government and its opponents used the contest as a bargaining chip to extract concessions from each other as part of a negotiation process meant to end the country’s complex social, economic and political crisis. Maduro and an opposition faction backed by the U.S. government last week agreed to work together on basic conditions for the presidential contest. That prompted the government to release six political prisoners and the Biden administration to lift key economic sanctions. As part of the agreement, Maduro’s administration and the opposition are supposed to “recognize and respect the right of each political actor to select” a presidential candidate freely.If organizers declare Machado the primary's winner, the focus will shift to Maduro to see if the government reverses its ban on her seeking public office. In June, the government issued an administrative decision prohibiting Machado from running, alleging fraud and tax violations and accusing her of seeking the economic sanctions the U.S. imposed on Venezuela in the last decade. The U.S., holding up the threat of renewed sanctions, has given Venezuela until the end of November to establish a process for reinstating all candidates expeditiously.A U.N.-backed panel investigating human rights abuses in Venezuela said last month that Maduro’s government has intensified efforts to curtail democratic freedoms ahead of the 2024 election. That includes subjecting some politicians and other opponents to detention, surveillance, threats, defamatory campaigns and arbitrary criminal proceedings.All registered voters in Venezuela were allowed to participate in the primary, as well as tens of thousands living in several other countries.“This is unprecedented,” said a smiling María de los Ángeles León, 31, the coordinator of Mexico City’s voting site. “People know that we have no guarantees that the winner of this election will be able to advance to the presidential election, but we keep trying.”___Associated Press writer María Verza in Mexico City contributed to this report.。 可是，在学历极度贬值、顶级高校博士硕士人数居然超过本科、本科生热衷“本升专”的当下，211真的能继续高高在上吗？至于主播这个行当，真的比一窝蜂考公考编低贱吗？我的答案都是否定的。 在传统观念中，学历越高，意味着更大的社会资本、更优越的职业前景和更高的生活品质。在正常社会状态下，这个规律当然没错。但在社会多重因素的作用下，学历极度贬值，这个规律自然会被打破。
四 | 我是扩招前一年参加的高考，曾有同学大致对比过，如果晚一年参加高考，前一年的二本分数足以考上重点本科。经过1999年以来的二十多年扩招潮，学历的水分之大已经超乎想象。90年代的高中，能实现100%上线率和五成本科率，就已经可以在省内成为顶流，如今呢？985、211都是成批成批的。 更何况，在如今的社会结构中，学历虽仍是最重要的敲门砖，但在一些新兴领域和行业里，比如内容创业、电竞、短视频和直播等，学历已经不是硬性门槛。人工智能引领的未来，会让个人学习能力和技能变得更重要，学历只能作为参考，尤其是在中国的教育体系下，这个参考意义甚至相当有限。
五 | 当然，在中国人普遍的认知里，“职业不分贵贱”向来只是口头说说，对“高端职业”的认知就是“吃公家饭”。前些年流行的山东段子，“有编制月薪三千叫正经工作，企业里年薪百万叫不务正业”其实从不是山东专利，而是这片土地的普遍认知。原因很简单，“公家饭”意味着权力，即使没有寻租空间，起码有了一个可以依靠的单位和圈子，在人情社会里好办事。
六 | 所以，公务员看不起一般的事业单位，事业单位看不起企业，企业看不起灵活就业，是一条相当固定的鄙视链。
七 | 主播这种新兴行业，不否认有拉低行业下限的人存在，但即使是正儿八经的从业者，在某些人看来也“天然不正经”。同样是高校的招聘会，大国企能让学生平添对学校的自豪感，招聘主播就会让学生觉得学校堕落了。 教育是社会的延伸，社会整体思维以权力为尊，以“公家饭”为荣，教育也会走向“等级导向”而非“能力导向”。 正常文明社会的教育，目标是培养个人的能力、素养、价值观，而非让其成为某个“等级”的象征。但在中国社会，显然不是如此。
八 | 学校搞校庆，最推崇的校友当然是官员，行政级别就是校友等级。 这当然是现实，但另一个现实也不得不正视，那就是经济下行和学历贬值的就业现实。南昌大学能让主播企业入驻招聘会，即使是所谓的“审查不严”，也是相当务实的做法。它起码客观承认了就业的多元化需求，对接了真实的市场需求。
九 | 如果抛开社会本不该有的权力寻租、退休金差异等暗面因素，仅从职业本身而论，主播和体制内一样都是社会需要的合法职业，都需要专业能力和职业素养，并没有本质差异。 很多人认为主播行业强调外表，其实外表一直都是个体条件的一部分，有些行业对外表有要求，一直是客观事实，体制内同样如此，甚至更为明显。甚至可以说，主播比体制内大多数岗位要求的能力都更多（尤其是在许多人考公考编只为上岸）。相比外表，内容策划、创意、传播手段、表演能力、互动技巧、市场分析，乃至自主品牌的创建、供应链管理等，都更为重要。 我反而觉得，主播行业需要的是个体努力，它固然没有传统观念最看重的“稳定”，也不符合传统观念的“体面”，但实际上比这个社会的大多数行当都干净得多。 相反，一窝蜂地考公考编，将之“尊称”为“上岸”，呈现出的功利心态，还有工作后无法避免地说假话、形式主义，打着“适应社会”旗号对人情和权力的服从，都显得比主播行业低贱得多，对社会的危害也大得多。 更重要的是，大多数基层公务员面对爹味领导、无意义工作、形式主义和严苛等级时的唯唯诺诺，真的拥有比主播更多的尊严吗？当然，有人认为只要工作稳定、收入稳定就有尊严，那当我没说过。 南昌大学道歉新闻的评论区里，有一组对话很有趣，可以拿来做此文结尾——有网友怒斥南昌大学招聘会“乱象”，认为主播行业“虚假、作秀、忽悠人”，另一位网友回复“你说的是主播，还是著名的统计局？” 本文来自微信公众号：那些原本是废话的常识，作者：叶克飞。
Current article:http://gqt.caonaishengpengchuali.shop/fweh/xee8.html
Published on:03:54:04